This column is all about media as the battleground of the marketing world – a world constantly at war as each company pushes its brands in the name of service to the consumer, providing us with goods and services that our everyday lives depend on. Needless to say, political parties are also companies that push for their individual candidates as brands, promoting them and “selling” them to voters at election time. It is also about the marketing of media themselves – how individual media channels compete for our attention, and consequently become molders of our tastes and preferences.
In the past week and a half, the internet has been abuzz about a leaked series of emails. No it is not another Wikileaks episode involving issues of national security, but it is of equal if not greater, gargantuan proportions. It has not gotten a lot of press locally, but the local blogger community has been following the story day in day out for the past week or so.
The issue involves subscriber security. But the scandal involves the use of a perfectly legitimate marketing tool – public relations – for not so legitimate means or purposes. As of this writing, Facebook has already come clean and admitted that yes, they did hired one of the biggest PR companies in the world, Burson-Marsteller, to do a demolition job on Facebook. This is one for the books – when a tech titan goes into the dirty tricks department and gets caught red-handed, what happens next? The general observation is… So far, nothing. Not yet anyway. It will take the Federal Trade Commission a while to sort this one out.
Facebook had initially denied or at least did not confirm it, but eventually (apparently upon better advice from more level headed consultants) owned up to the dirty deed. It was supposed to be a whisper campaign that would point subscribers to a questionable new feature of their Google accounts, the “Social Circle” – a feature that supposedly mines the subscriber’s data base of contacts and sites visited that would be a violation of policies on subscriber privacy. The clumsy attempt overlooks the fact that it is an old feature, not a new one, so technically, it’s not news anymore, and the presentation was misleading and unduly alarming. In any case, the tactic that they employed was what killed them – they chose to engage a highly respected blogger named Christopher Soghoian, whose expertise is privacy and internet security, hoping he would cooperate by publishing under his name the black propaganda that they had ghost-written for him. And what did Mr. Soghoian do? He posted the exchange of emails between him and the PR company, exposing the attempt. Bang!
Big companies engaging PR agencies for black propaganda work is not new. In the local scene, this kind of activity is usually more visible during the election campaign season. And yes, sometimes it backfires. Or, doesn’t do any damage at all. Remember the issue of P.Noy’s supposed mental disorder? According to that story, a document from the Ateneo, signed by Fr. Carmelo Caluag, indicated that then presidential candidate Noynoy Aquino suffered from some kind of depression. The document was soon enough established as a fake, and no real damage was done, as Noynoy’s popularity was undiminished and he went on to win the elections by a wide margin. Exposing the ploy probably won him even more votes.
What prompted this? Google had earlier announced that they would like to go into the social arena, even dangling carrots like bonuses for employees if they succeed in getting into Facebook’s turf. It’s a declaration of war, or at least an invasion. It seems that Facebook believes that Google employees are happy enough with what they have. They don’t need more reasons to be any happier.
But their counter-invasion tactics will need to be reviewed. To quote Michael Arrington at TechCrunch, who excoriated Facebook for this failed attack:
“Secretly paying a PR firm to pitch bloggers on stories going after Google, even offering to help write those stories and then get them published elsewhere, is not just offensive, dishonest and cowardly. It’s also really, really dumb. I have no idea how the Facebook PR team thought that they’d avoid being caught doing this.”
Seriously now, what were they thinking?
Federalism, Government Debt, Civil Society and the Private SectorPutting high emphasis on one form of government tend to blind people into glorifying one form over another, hoping that such change in political structure will deliver the necessary development ... Read more Less Government | Nonoy Oplas | Sunday, 20 May 2012 | Hits: 42 | Comments |
Avengers AssembleAs our movie houses are conquered by “The Avengers” and as that pelenovela (political-economic telenovela) unfolds in the Senate, some other matters with long-term implications are transpiring in the halls ... Read more Warp 9! | Louie Montemar | Friday, 18 May 2012 | Hits: 40 | Comments |
Fixing the President’s Image for the General Welfare: An Open Letter to the Presidential CThe past week, we heard confirmation from the President himself that he and Ms. Grace Lee, a TV and radio personality have gone separate ways – claiming that they are ... Read more Trend Blazer | Aaron Benedict De Leon | Friday, 18 May 2012 | Hits: 41 | Comments |
A Tale of Two Fights: The Thrilla in NAIA and Game 7 of the PBA FinalsSunday, May 6 was quite an eventful day for many. It was a day of fights and competition, where the victors were supposed to stand tall and the ... Read more Trend Blazer | Aaron Benedict De Leon | Friday, 11 May 2012 | Hits: 150 | Comments |